Readers' Response: 'Best in Class" Draft 1
In the article, “Dubbed ‘the best in class’: 6 things about Hong
Kong’s MTR rail system,” Khan (as quoted in Lee, 2015) was filled with
commendations on Hong Kong's Mass Transit Railway (MTR) and pinpoint that the
standards of MTR should be used as the basic criterion for railway operator in
other countries. Firstly, it states that Hong Kong's railway has one of the
most profitable revenue and mentioned that due to hundreds of different
stations, it carried millions of passengers daily across the entire coverage
network distance of 221km. It also commented that MTR encounters a significant
small number of minor delays as it spends more than one third of MTR
Corporation’s (MTRC) revenue on rail maintenance, as well as conducting
frequent quality check to maintain the system. In addition, Lee remarked that
MTRC is highly efficient in manpower and dealing with crowd control measures to
broadcast critical information to it respective stations when a problem
occurred. With all these measurements, it is absolutely a good practice for
railway operating system to maintain the high standards and efficiency that it
has.
One of the reasons why Hong
Kong’s MTR is efficient is due to the facts that it only faced a significant
minor percentage of train delays. In the article, “How successful is Hong Kong’s
MTR compared to S’pore’s MRT? Unbelievable. Out of this world.” Lay (2016)
states that for the first half of 2014, Hong Kong commuters experienced a delay
of at least five minutes in only one out of every 300,000km travelled. On the
other hand, Singapore SMRT’s suffers from an average of one disruption for
every 133,000 km. This is one of the most important factor because if the
trains keep delay as time goes by, commuters will lose faith and confidence
towards it operator. If this happen, there will be a drop in its revenue and
might deal with financial issues.
Another reason why Hong Kong’s MTR is efficiency is also because
of its high investment on maintenance and manpower. In the article, “Look to
Hong Kong’s MTR for lessons,” Wong (2015) states that MTR can replace a 60m rail piece in 150 minutes, and within
the constraints of its daily maintenance window, which is from 1am to 5am. This
is executed by over 1,000 workers focused primarily on maintenance work for the
rail lines. Compared to Singapore SMRT’s, it only inspects the entire track
system, tunnels and viaducts once every four to seven days as well as lacking
of skilled staffs in railway engineering field. I believe that in order for
commuters to have a smoother journey, the investment to maintain, upgrades, and
renewal to its system is very crucial. From this, it shows that Hong Kong’s MTR
is one of a good example on how to maintain it high efficiency on maintenance.
As mentioned from the sources
above, it shows that in order to maintain a low percentage of train breaking down,
it required daily maintenance check through the use of massive manpower and equipment.
Thus, making Hong Kong’s MTR one of the best railway operating system to maintain it high efficiency and standards.
References:
Dubbed 'the best in class': 6 things about Hong Kong's
MTR rail system
How successful is Hong
Kong’s MTR compared to S’pore’s MRT?
Look to Hong Kong's MTR for lessons
Comments
Post a Comment