Reader Respond Draft 3
In the article, “Dubbed ‘the best in class’: 6
things about Hong Kong’s MTR rail system,” Khaw (as quoted in Lee, 2015) was
full of praises on Hong Kong's Mass Transit Railway (MTR) and highlighted that
the standards of MTR should be used as the basic criterion for railway operator
in other countries. Firstly, Lee stated that Hong Kong's railway is one of the
most profitable revenue and mentioned that due to hundreds of different
stations, it carried millions of passengers daily across the entire coverage
network distance of 221km. Lee also commented that MTR encountered a
significant small number of minor delays as it spends more than one third of
MTR Corporation’s (MTRC) revenue on rail maintenance, as well as conducting
frequent quality check to maintain the system. In addition, Lee remarked that
MTRC was highly efficient in manpower and dealing with crowd control measures
to broadcast critical information to it respective stations when a problem
occurred. With all these measurements, MTR was one of the best railway operator
in terms of maintaining the high standard of efficiency that it has.
One of the reasons why
Hong Kong’s MTR is efficient is due to the facts that it only faced a
significant minor percentage of train delays. In the article, “How successful
is Hong Kong’s MTR compared to S’pore’s MRT? Unbelievable. Out of this world.”
Lay (2016) states that for the first half of 2014, Hong Kong commuters
experienced a delay of at least five minutes in only one out of every 300,000km
travelled. On the other hand, Singapore SMRT’s suffers from an average of one
disruption for every 133,000 km. This is one of the most important factor
because if the trains keep delay as time goes by, commuters will lose faith and
confidence towards it operator. If this happen, there will be a drop in revenue
and might deal with financial issues.
Another reason why Hong Kong’s MTR is
efficiency is also due to its high investment on maintenance and manpower. In
the article, “Look to Hong Kong’s MTR for lessons,” Wong (2015) states that MTR can replace a 60m rail piece in 150 minutes and within
the constraints of its daily maintenance window, which is from 1am to 5am. This
is executed by over 1,000 workers focused primarily on maintenance work for the
rail lines. Compared to Singapore SMRT’s, it only inspects the entire track
system, tunnels and viaducts once every four to seven days as well as lacking
of skilled staffs in the railway engineering field. I believe that in order for
commuters to have a smoother journey, the investment to maintain, upgrades, and
renewal to its system is very crucial. From this, it shows that Hong Kong’s MTR
is one of a good example on how to maintain it high efficiency on maintenance.
As mentioned from the
sources above, Hong Kong’s MTR shows that in order to maintain a low percentage
of train breaking down, it required daily maintenance check through the use of
massive manpower and equipment. Thus, making Hong Kong’s MTR one of the best railway operating
system to maintain it high efficiency and standards.
References:
Lee, M.K. Dubbed 'the best in class': 6
things about Hong Kong's MTR rail system. (2015). The Straits Time. Retrieved,
September 26, 2017 from
Lay, Belmont. How
successful is Hong Kong’s MTR compared to S’pore’s MRT? (2016). Mothership.
Retrieved, September 26, 2017 from
Wong, S.S. Look to Hong Kong's MTR for
lessons. (2015). The Straits Time. Retrieved, September 26, 2017 from
Comments
Post a Comment